From Scratch to Streamlined: Comparing My Hand-Built Genetic Algorithm with sklearn-genetic

After building a genetic algorithm from scratch in Jupyter, I wanted to see what would happen if I used a library instead. Specifically, I tried out sklearn-genetic, a tool that wraps genetic feature selection into a few clean lines of code.

The difference is incredible. My original notebook was over one hundred lines of code. With sklearn-genetic, the same process became a single call:

selector = GAFeatureSelectionCV(
estimator=DecisionTreeClassifier(random_state=RANDOM_STATE),
cv=CROSS_VALIDATION_SPLITTING,
scoring=SCORING_STRATEGY,
population_size=POPULATION_SIZE,
generations=NUM_GENERATIONS,
mutation_probability=MUTATION_RATE,
)
selector.fit(X, y)

It worked beautifully. But it’s worth thinking about what I gained and lost with the different approaches.

What the Library Does Well

  • Speed of implementation: No need to write selection, crossover, or mutation logic. It’s all built in.
  • Robustness: It easily handles edge cases, parallelism, and scoring strategies.
  • Integration: Fits seamlessly into scikit-learn pipelines and workflows.
  • Convenience: You can run a full GA in minutes, with clean syntax and very little code.

Certainly the library has some big advantages, as libraries really should! 😀

What I Missed from Building It Myself

  • Visibility: In my notebook, I saw every generation evolve. With the library, that process is hidden.
  • Control: I had access to the state of the system at all times, so I could change parameters or visualize data in the middle of a run.
  • Learning: Writing the GA by hand taught me how each operator affects convergence, diversity, and exploration.
  • Philosophy: My notebook felt like a real experiment. The library felt like a tool.

The approaches serve different purposes. But if your goal is to actually learn genetic algorithms, building one yourself is irreplaceable.

Side-by-Side Summary

AspectHand-Built GAsklearn-genetic
TransparencyFull control over internalsAbstracted
FlexibilityEasy to customize logicLimited to API
SpeedSlower to build, faster to understandFaster to run, harder to inspect
Learning ValueHighModerate

Final Thoughts

Using sklearn-genetic felt like using any library, you hand off control. It’s efficient, clean, and powerful. But building the algorithm myself taught me how the engine works, how selection pressure shapes populations, how mutation keeps diversity alive, and how exploration leads to clarity.

If you’re just trying to get results, use the library.
If you’re trying to understand the process, build it yourself.
And if you’re trying to do both — start with the notebook, then graduate to the tool.

– William

My notebook can be found in my GitHub repo here:

Genetic Algorithm Notebook

Comments

Leave a comment